Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Who Knew? Steven Holmes Knew

All this came about after the CONGRESS passed the “Community Reinvestment Act” mandating that banks make a certain percentage of their loans to borrowers whose credit was ‘less than stellar’.

And folks all the way up to members of CONGRESS and even Alan Greenspan were “shocked” when it played out exactly as foreseen nine years ago.
TO THINK THIS WAS PUBLISHED IN THE NEW YORK TIMES ALMOST 9 YEARS AGO


NEW YORK TIMES
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University 's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by 46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Zero responces! eh! Thus far!

Why?

Because, human nature being what it is, people do not want to know, what they do not want to know. The public is at fault here as well in that regard. However...

It is the "don't confuse me with the facts" syndrome. This applies to the lazyness of the American citizenry, as well as those so-called "public servants", who let it all slde, and played "kick the can" with all of this. And you know who you are.

Heaven forbid that the people in our United States Congress, should actually take full and complete responsibility for allowing all of this finanacial mudslide to occur in the first place, and on their watch. Mostly Dems. But Reps alike, and for not screaming nightly in the direction of the American public for the past decade or more, and sounding the alarm bell.

If they did not see it coming, it is due to a combination of monumental stupidity, and or collective corruption to their core.

This was a political decision making process, and not an economic decision making process at all. And decisions made by attorneys and MBA's, posing as "lawmakers" (in Washington & Minnesota), all beleiving somehow, as though they would all be gone by the time the sh-t hit the fan.

In the alternative, these are simply very stupid AND corrupt people. ..Barney Frank - Franklin Raines - Nancy Pelosi - Harry Reid - Chris Dodd - Jamie Gorelick - Jim Johnson - Maxine Waters - and their republican counterparts, equally guilty for their tepid approach to all of this. Oh Hell!...there are too many to reference. It will suffice to say, shame on all of you.

...And then there are folks of the very same ilk on the Minnesota homefront, burying this wonderful place in layers and layers of red ink, year after year, while somehow beleiving that we cannot become the economic nightmare, which is now Michigan. Go figure!

My ultimate message in all of this is the following. Please resign - go to a jail cell - or - get prepared for a revolution of sorts someday.

People will only take just so much of this crap. And the guilty will eventually have no place to hide.

In any event, the result will be the same, as it has been throughout history. For now however, it will be the American people who will pay the ultimate price for this disgrace, and for generations to come.

Grandma Linda said...

Hi Drew,
Actually you know me, Linda (Gengler) Odell. I was listening to K Talk Radio tonite and heard your name. I want to tell you that both myself and my husband Rusty support your work and are willing to get involved. If you could point me in right direction that would help. I am currently the Administrator for a major privately owned medical clinic in Edina and Health Care is of great interest to me.
Keep up the good work! Nice to hear your voice.

Linda

Anonymous said...

Everybody knows that the name Steven Holmes, is actually George Bush's pen name.

Aha! It's George Bush's fault. ...for not letting the cat out of the bag sooner about all this. ...I knew it all along.

Prediction: In 2012, it'll all be President George Bush's fault, all over again. In 2016 too.

Ask yourself this question: Either in Minnesota, or with overdue regard to the national stage. When was the last time a Democrat accepted responsibility for anything? ...Relating to their rather slippery and smarmy personal lives, or the remarkable consistantcy of their self serving "public servant" performance? When?

I am 60 now, I cannot remember that far back. How about you?

There is such a thing as good and evil. Truly!

Phil said...

Ask yourself this question: Either in Minnesota, or with overdue regard to the national stage. When was the last time a Democrat accepted responsibility for anything? ...Relating to their rather slippery and smarmy personal lives, or the remarkable consistantcy of their self serving "public servant" performance? When?


When is the last time a Neo Con Republican was accountable or took responsibility?

And how bad do Liberals have to be to match Republicans poking little boys and each other?